Choosing the Right AI Vendor

AI vendor selection involves capability, cost, support, security, scalability, integration, and risk. Subjective scoring and inconsistent criteria lead to poor decisions. A weighted scorecard with configurable criteria and visual comparisons helps teams evaluate vendors objectively and document rationale for procurement and audit.

Different use cases prioritize different criteria: regulated industries weight security and compliance; fast-moving product teams may prioritize integration and innovation. This tool lets you set weights per criterion and compare vendors on a level playing field. Radar charts and bar comparisons make strengths and gaps visible at a glance.

Who This Tool Is For

Procurement leads, AI architects, and product managers comparing AI vendors or platforms. Use it to score vendors across capability, cost, support, security, scalability, integration, innovation, and risk. Adjust weights to match your priorities. Suitable for financial services, healthcare, technology, and retail.

Run evaluations during RFP processes, vendor refresh cycles, or when adding new AI capabilities. Share the PDF with stakeholders to align on selection criteria and outcomes. Contact Infinidatum for more.

What You Get

A multi-criteria vendor scorecard with weighted scores, radar charts, and side-by-side comparison. Add vendors, set scores and weights, and view ranked results. Export a PDF report with scores and recommendations for vendor selection and contract negotiation.

The PDF includes criterion-by-criterion scores, weighted totals, and visual comparisons. Use it in procurement documentation, architecture decisions, and executive reviews. Contact Infinidatum for more.

Back to Tools
Multi-Criteria Evaluation Framework • Infinidatum Version 2.0.0

AI Vendor Evaluation Scorecard

Compare AI vendors using multi-criteria evaluation, weighted scoring, risk assessment, and vendor comparison matrix.

Add Vendors

Configure and evaluate AI vendors

Total Vendors
2

⚠️ Vendor name is required

5
5
5
5
5
5
5
6

Current Vendors

Vendor A
Capability: 8
Cost: 7
Support: 8
Security: 9
Vendor B
Capability: 7
Cost: 8
Support: 7
Security: 8

Evaluation Results

Comprehensive vendor comparison and scoring

Weighted Scores

Multi-Dimensional Comparison

Vendor Comparison Matrix

CriterionVendor AVendor BWeight
Capability
8/10
7/10
25%
Cost Value
7/10
8/10
15%
Support Quality
8/10
7/10
15%
Security & Compliance
9/10
8/10
15%
Scalability
8/10
7/10
10%
Integration Ease
7/10
8/10
10%
Innovation Roadmap
8/10
7/10
5%
Risk Level
8/10
7/10
5%

Comparison by Criteria

CapabilityWeight: 25%
Vendor A
8/10
Vendor B
7/10
Cost ValueWeight: 15%
Vendor A
7/10
Vendor B
8/10
Support QualityWeight: 15%
Vendor A
8/10
Vendor B
7/10
Security & ComplianceWeight: 15%
Vendor A
9/10
Vendor B
8/10
ScalabilityWeight: 10%
Vendor A
8/10
Vendor B
7/10
Integration EaseWeight: 10%
Vendor A
7/10
Vendor B
8/10
Innovation RoadmapWeight: 5%
Vendor A
8/10
Vendor B
7/10
Risk LevelWeight: 5%
Vendor A
8/10
Vendor B
7/10

Ranked Vendors

#1 Vendor A
Weighted Score: 7.90/10
Recommended
Capability: 8/10
Cost: 7/10
Support: 8/10
Security: 9/10
Scalability: 8/10
Integration: 7/10
Innovation: 8/10
Risk: 3/10
#2 Vendor B
Weighted Score: 7.40/10
Capability: 7/10
Cost: 8/10
Support: 7/10
Security: 8/10
Scalability: 7/10
Integration: 8/10
Innovation: 7/10
Risk: 4/10

Evaluation Criteria Weights

Capability:25%
Cost Value:15%
Support Quality:15%
Security & Compliance:15%
Scalability:10%
Integration Ease:10%
Innovation Roadmap:5%
Risk Level:5%

Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Analysis

Vendor A

Initial Cost
$97,750
Annual Cost
$138,000
3-Year TCO
$511,750
5-Year TCO
$787,750
Cost Breakdown:
License: $115,000
Implementation: $57,500
Customization: $17,250
Support: $23,000
Training: $8,625
Integration: $14,375

Vendor B

Initial Cost
$93,500
Annual Cost
$132,000
3-Year TCO
$489,500
5-Year TCO
$753,500
Cost Breakdown:
License: $110,000
Implementation: $55,000
Customization: $16,500
Support: $22,000
Training: $8,250
Integration: $13,750

Vendor Risk Assessment

Vendor A

2.8/10
Overall Risk
Security & Compliance2.0/10

Security score: 9/10

Mitigation: Standard security review

Scalability Limitations3.0/10

Scalability score: 8/10

Mitigation: Monitor growth requirements

Support Quality3.0/10

Support score: 8/10

Mitigation: Standard support agreement

Innovation & Roadmap3.0/10

Innovation score: 8/10

Mitigation: Monitor product updates

Vendor B

3.8/10
Overall Risk
Security & Compliance3.0/10

Security score: 8/10

Mitigation: Standard security review

Scalability Limitations4.0/10

Scalability score: 7/10

Mitigation: Monitor growth requirements

Support Quality4.0/10

Support score: 7/10

Mitigation: Standard support agreement

Innovation & Roadmap4.0/10

Innovation score: 7/10

Mitigation: Monitor product updates

Feature Comparison Matrix

FeatureVendor AVendor BBest VendorScore Spread
Core Capability
8/10
7/10
Vendor A1.0
Security & Compliance
9/10
8/10
Vendor A1.0
Scalability
8/10
7/10
Vendor A1.0
Integration Ease
7/10
8/10
Vendor B1.0
Support Quality
8/10
7/10
Vendor A1.0
Innovation Roadmap
8/10
7/10
Vendor A1.0

Integration Complexity Analysis

Vendor A

1.3/10
Complexity
Estimated Integration Time
1 months
Estimated Integration Cost
$6,400
Complexity Factors:
API Complexity1.6/10

Standard APIs with some complexity

Data Migration1.2/10

Some data transformation required

System Integration1.2/10

Standard integration patterns

Vendor B

1.0/10
Complexity
Estimated Integration Time
1 months
Estimated Integration Cost
$4,800
Complexity Factors:
API Complexity1.2/10

Well-documented REST APIs

Data Migration0.9/10

Standard data formats, easy migration

System Integration0.9/10

Pre-built connectors available

Vendor Evaluation

This tool requires Analyst or higher. Upgrade your plan to access.